But is it right? - My comment

In the article titled “But is it right? From the blog “If You Ask Me”. The discussion is on Obama’s plan to put off deciding the immigration law until 2010. Immigration has always been and will most likely be a very touchy subject to everyone that lives in the US and is a US citizen. But look back before our four fathers were even here, they too were immigrants to the US.

The Indians had this land before us and we came in a claimed this land for our own. Don’t get me wrong I love the US and being a US citizen for my 39 years on this earth has been wonderful. But, the immigrants that are migrating to the US are looking for the same thing that our great-great-great grandparents were looking for, and that is freedom!

And in saying all of that, I do believe that there have been a lot of immigrants in this country that are here illegally. All that we ask is that you become a citizen and pay taxes like we do. I was born here so I’m grandfathered in. But I would take the test to become a citizen if it came to that.

According to the CNN.com article “Could you pass the new citizenship test?” The Government says, “The new test has more concept-based civics, history questions. But Immigrant advocates say, “Changes may strain stretched-thin civics programs.” They are changing questions from "How many stars are there on our flag?" and "Name the amendments that guarantee or address voting rights." To such questions like: "There are four amendments to the Constitution about who can vote. Describe one of them," and "What is one responsibility that is only for United States citizens?"

Seems easy for me being that I have lived here all my life took History and Government classes in school. But for someone that does not speak English or has not lived here these might seem like scary questions. But if the roles were reversed, how many questions could you get on a Citizenship test if you wanted to become the citizen of Mexico?

Tax Hike, Smack Hike!

With the talk in the news now of a tax hike people are getting worried. As well they should be worried. A tax hike for some people is not that big a deal if you’re rolling in money. Or made of money for that matter, but for some it is a real burden. I already hear the cringing effects now!

If your one of the lucky ones that make less than $250,000, then you’re going to be OK say politicians. They have said, “If you make under $250,000, you will not see your taxes increased by a single dime.” Do we really believe this and take it at face value? I heard someone say once, “No new taxes!” And what did we get!

Our President is trying to get us out of the slump we have been in, since the last President. I will not name any names, but his initials are “George W. Bush”. What, with the spending on the Iraq War and the recent talks about going to the Moon, again. Can’t we spend the money on something that will be worth it?

Someone please tell me there are far better places to go than to the moon? We’ve been there before. It’s a barren land. Nothing is there except “Our Flag”, and a rover. Let’s stay in America and help the 46 million people that do not have Health Care Insurance.

“No new Taxes!” that’s my slogan. I’m going make bumpers stickers and t-shirts and get the word out. We have to stop this; we need to save money… I’ve got it, let’s all switch to Geico!

Our health care and our country by the blog "US Goverment"

The blog titled Our health care and our country,,,, by the Blog Site U.S. Government talks about the state of the Health Care system in our Country. It explains the need for health care reform, by sighting the French and their no cost Health Care.

I would agree with this on several points. Health care has been the talk of the town lately and there needs to be something done about it, and fast. Americans without health insurance is on the rise and a no cost health plan would be beneficial to those that do not have health insurance.

Kids need this type of program more than ever. There are millions of kids with debilitating diseases and no health insurance. Or they have been denied based on a pre-existing condition, how is this fair at all? Emergency visits are sometimes a must for lots of people that do not have or can afford insurance.

The U.S. should step back and look at the “Health” of America. It is declining every day. With H1N1, AIDS as well as cancer. The later are very costly to treat and without insurance Americans will go broke paying for costly medical bills when there are solutions that the government can implement.

Sarah Palin’s Lame Duck Recipe

Sarah Palin’s Lame Duck Recipe:
On her last day as Governor, Sarah Palin served food to waiting people in Anchorage. I’m wondering if this will be a foreshadowing of things to come for Sarah Palin. She left people wondering why and how could she leave office after only 2 years. I’m asking myself the same thing.

She stated in her speech, “LIFE is about choices!” Well Sarah, I think you’ve made a bad choice, in my opinion. What will be next for her? Some say she will run for President in 2012, but this has not been substantiated. And as of late her political committee has raised 1 million dollars. So what is she going to do with this money? Campaign for the 2012 Presidency?

McCains campaign was not helped by her being his Vice President nominee. This nominee pick was a complete surprise. I had not heard of Sarah Palin until she was nominated. Which I guess is the way it is if you’re not on the political front all the time. Who is going to vote for her? I know she has followers, most are in Alaska. But I’m not sure she would get the majority vote.

How is she going to help Alaska if she is not in a political position? This makes no since to me, as did most of her press conferences and media interviews. I think the foreshadowing that I mentioned earlier will be her coup de grace. I see the “golden arches” calling. Or maybe she can be a stunt double for Tina Fey.

TAKE TWO ASPIRIN AND CALL ME WHEN YOUR CANCER IS STAGE 4

Ann Coulters article “TAKE TWO ASPIRIN AND CALL ME WHEN YOUR CANCER IS STAGE 4” talks about the governments interference in the Health Care Reform. I believe that Ann has several valid points when talking about health reform. She states that governments have already created such programs, such as “Medicare, Medicaid, veterans' hospitals, emergency rooms and tax-deductible employer-provided health care”.

I have health insurance through my employer and believe that unlike most insurance plans, mine is very good and pays for a lot of things that normal insurance does not already. Like IUI, IVF (to some extent). Health Care Reform will most likely be a hot topic for some time and a thorn in everyone’s sides. I do also believe that some insurance plans are very expensive and do not cover a large portion of medical ailments.

I do not however feel that she should lump car insurance and health insurance in the same category, they are 2 different animals and should be kept as such. Her statement regarding car insurance, “This would be like requiring all car insurance to cover the cost of gasoline, oil and tire changes”. Does have merit, in that if they cover one thing in this plan they should cover the entire thing. Not just cover the car itself but also the amenities that go along with it.

She has geared her article I believe to all people, but most for the benefit of Democrats and to the Obama supporters. The meaning of health insurance is not just for emergencies only. Some medical procedures are very expensive and health insurance is there to provide support for them. Your out of pocket costs would be outrageous if you didn’t have insurance.

In closing health insurance should be offered to anyone that works, provided to them by their employers. But if you have to get your own health insurance there should be a cap on what you have to pay to get it. Everyone needs to be able to provide for their families and should not have to worry about health insurance, and the health of their families.

The Obama Agenda Bogs Down

Not sure what point Fred Barnes is trying to make in is The Obama Agenda Bogs Down article. Fred Barnes is the executive editor of the Weekly Standard. He is weekly commentator for FOX News and they were and have always been Republican supporters. His article dated July 20th 2009 talks about the Editorial on Health Care Reform and the Stimulus package that President Obama got passed, saying that the President and Democrats have made mistakes with them both. It was under my impression that the Stimulus would take some time to take effect. Fred Barnes believes that if the Democrats had “listened” to Republicans on the stimulus then the “economy wouldn’t be any worse.” I really beg to differ on this statement. George W. Bush got us in the mess we’re in at the moment. What, with spending for the war in Iraq, and sending enormous amounts of troops that last I heard did not have “weapons of mass destruction” there in the first place. He claims that President Obama’s approval rating is slipping. That may be, but in my view he is cleaning up a mess that was created by the Republicans. Public desire for Obama to keep pressing on the major issues of our economy, health care and on the deficit. “Majorities still think he is either doing the right amount or should put greater emphasis on each of these issues.” Fred Barnes article I believe is directed toward the Republicans of the world. Fred’s argument on healthcare is also Democratic bashed directed. His statement, “His plan has been to exploit the economic downturn to enact his entire agenda, not just the stimulus”. What agenda is this? President Obama is attempting to rectify errors and blunders produced during the Bush Administration. Fred also states that the republicans would have used the money (stimulus) to spend on tax reforms that would have encouraged economic growth.

Health care overhaul clears divided Senate committee

Health care reform in the United States is always a hot topic of debate between Democrats and Republicans, no one ever sees eye to eye. But one proposal on the health care system passed a Senate committee. According to Sen. Edward Kennedy, its chairman, said, "We have done the hard work that the American people sent us here to do." If passed this would allow government-run health insurance programs, it would also require companies with more than 25 employees to provide medical coverage for their workers. This in my opinion is a big deal. Health care is a must in this day and age. Otherwise the out of pocket cots for Insurance would be outrageous. It would set up an "exchange" to let people choose from a variety of insurance options. Republicans are calling it a failure. So who is right? This is the purpose of the senate/congress to vote on hard issues that not everyone agrees on. Obama believes that this would offer stability as well as security to Americans. This article is worth reading. You may or may not agree on all points of Health Care Reform but this county needs some type of health care that is affordable and easy for all Americans. The article's link is located here Health care overhaul

I am generally even of the road on most things, and my voting experience has been quite good since I started voting in 2000. My wife got me into voting and I'm glad she did. I'm a newcomer, I guess you would say when it comes to voting. I hope to learn more on our government to make me more knowledgeable. I saw a bumper sticker once that sums up the way I feel now, "Don't vote? Then don't bitch."

Where do you fit? Your Results

Liberal Based on your answers to the questionnaire, you most closely resemble survey respondents within the Liberal typology group. This does not mean that you necessarily fit every group characteristic or agree with the group on all issues. Liberals represent 17 percent of the American public, and 19 percent of registered voters. Basic Description This group has nearly doubled in proportion since 1999, Liberals now comprise the largest share of Democrats and is the single largest of the nine Typology groups. They are the most opposed to an assertive foreign policy, the most secular, and take the most liberal views on social issues such as homosexuality, abortion, and censorship. They differ from other Democratic groups in that they are strongly pro-environment and pro-immigration, issues which are more controversial among Conservative and Disadvantaged Democrats. Defining Values Strongest preference for diplomacy over use of military force. Pro-choice, supportive of gay marriage and strongly favor environmental protection. Low participation in religious activities. Most sympathetic of any group to immigrants as well as labor unions, and most opposed to the anti-terrorism Patriot Act. Who They Are Most (62%) identify themselves as liberal. Predominantly white (83%), most highly educated group (49% have a college degree or more), and youngest group after Bystanders. Least religious group in typology: 43% report they seldom or never attend religious services; nearly a quarter (22%) are seculars. More than one-third never married (36%). Largest group residing in urban areas (42%) and in the western half the country (34%). Wealthiest Democratic group (41% earn at least $75,000). Lifestyle Notes Largest group to have been born (or whose parents were born) outside of the U.S. or Canada (20%). Least likely to report having a gun at home (23%) or attending bible study or prayer group meetings (13%). 2004 Election Bush 2%, Kerry 81% Party ID 59% Democrat; 40% Independent/No Preference, 1% Republican (92% Dem/Lean Dem) Media Use Liberals are second only to Enterprisers in following news about government and public affairs most of the time (60%). Liberals’ use of the internet to get news is the highest among all groups (37%). Note: All descriptions and percentages are based on the national sample of adults surveyed by telephone in December. Based on your answers to the survey questions, you most closely resemble survey respondents within this group, even though you may differ significantly on one or more issues or traits. In the overall typology there is a ninth group called “Bystanders” who are defined as adults who are not registered, who do not follow news about government and public affairs, and who say they rarely or never vote.